« Arrrrrrgh!!! Response | Main | Hannah: Future Rose Festival Princess »

Briefly: More Measure 50 and Rep. Sara Gelser

For we Oregon voters with mail-in ballots freshly in hand, I recommend checking out City Club of Portland's Measure 50 analysis and recommendation.  This very clear and thorough document does a great job of dispelling the myths surrounding this issue.

In addition, if you didn't catch it on KOPB, City Club sponsored a Measure 50 debate (link to mp3).  Representitive Sara Gelser did a great job of laying out the sponsors' case for Measure 50, and, to be fair, J.L. Wilson came well-prepared to present the "No" position.  I enjoyed high school debate, and I thought both participants did well.

Speaking of Rep. Sara Gelser, she had a fantastic freshman year in the Oregon Legislature.  Kudos to her important legislative effort on behalf of families and individuals that experience disabilities.  Passage of HB 2406 - a bill that opens up home nursing support for kids beyond those that are technological dependent (our matching criteria in MFCU) - was a huge win for our community. 

This will be a huge help to some of the families I know.  Having support at home often allows families to stay together at home:  an important win for everyone.  See her introduction of the bill on the House floor. 

Thanks for all your work, Rep. Gelser!

-- Dad 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://kintropy.com/blog-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/220


Hosting by Yahoo!

Comments

Did anyone see that study mentioned in the Portland Tribune the other day?
Bottom line, Measure 50 would produce a net economic benefit of $163 million for low-income Oregonians.


Low income families will get $183 million in new health care, while low income smokers will spend $20 million more on cigarettes. Thus, the net effect is a positive $163 million.


I think this should put the argument about regressive taxation to rest. Measure 50 is a boon to low income families.

Thanks for your comment. I didn't see that article, but I'll look it up.

I think the most frustrating thing about the No campaign has been that they don't want to talk about the money allocation. The disinformation about how much goes to health care/Healthy Kids has been kind of the start and stop point, unfortunately.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)